Despite reaching a temporary stalemate, the currency war rages on,
and individual countries continue to debate whether they should enter or
watch their currencies continue to appreciate. Nowhere is that debate
stronger than in New Zealand, whose Kiwi currency has fallen 37% against the US Dollar since its peak in early 2009, and over 15% since June of this year.
With most countries, the war cries are coming from the political
establishment, who feel compelled to demonstrate to their constituents
that they are diligently monitoring the currency war. This is largely
the case in New Zealand, as Members of Parliament have argued forcefully
in favor of intervention. Prime Minister John Key
is a little more pragmatic: He “says his Government is concerned about
the strength of our dollar, but is not convinced intervention would
work…politicians who think intervention can happen without economic
consequences, are fooling themselves.” Showing an astute understanding
of economics, he pointed out that trying to limit the Kiwi’s
appreciation would manifest itself in the form of higher inflation,
higher interest rates, and/or reduced access to capital.
This is essentially the position of Alan Bollard,
Governor of the Central Bank of New Zealand. He has insisted
(correctly) that the New Zealand is being driven up, so much as its
currency counterparts – namely the US Dollar – are being driven
downward, by forces completely disconnected from New Zealand and way
beyond its control. Thus, if New Zealand tried to intervene, it would
quickly be overpowered (perhaps deliberately!) by speculators.
Ultimately, it would end up spending lots of money in vain, and the Kiwi
would continue to appreciate.
Mr. Bollard has pointed out that a stronger currency is not without
its perks: such as lower (relative) prices for certain natural
resources, such as oil. In addition, since New Zealand is largely a
commodity economy, its producers are being compensated for an expensive
currency in the form of higher prices for milk, wool, and other staple
exports. While its other manufacturing operations have been punished by
the expensive Kiwi, its economy is still relatively robust. Thanks to a
series of tax cuts and the lowest interest rates in New Zealand history,
GDP is forecast to return to trend in 2010 and 2011.
New Zealand’s concerns are understandable, and there is an argument
to be made for preventing the Dollars that are printed from the Fed’s
QE2 from being put to unproductive purposes in New Zealand. At the same
time, New Zealand is not such an attractive target for speculators. Its
benchmark interest rate, at 3%, is relatively low compared to developing
countries. Its current account balance is projected to continue
declining, perhaps down to -8%, which means that the net flow of capital
is actually out of New Zealand. In addition, while the Kiwi has
appreciated against the US Dollar, it has fallen mightily against the
Australian Dollar en route to a multi-year low.
Going forward, there is reason to believe that the New Zealand Dollar
will continue to appreciate against the US Dollar as a result of QE2
and a general sense of pessimism towards the US. The same is true with
regard to currencies that actively intervene to prevent their currencies
from appreciating. Still, I don’t think the New Zealand Dollar will
reach parity – against any currency – anytime soon, and after the
currency fracas subsides, it will probably trend towards its long-term
average.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment