With the US government doggedly clinging to the notion that China is
manipulating its currency and insisting that the communist country be
punished accordingly, it bears asking “how can we determine that a
currency (in this case the Yuan) is in fact undervalued, and if so, by
how much. One notable economist has laid out three general techniques
for “valuing a currency,” which may prove useful to all of you amateur
economists.
First, there is the concept known as “purchasing power parity,” which
suggests that a pair of currencies
should fluctuate in value relative
to each other based on changes in their respective interest rates and
inflation. Second, there is the notion of a “sustainable” or
“fundamental equilibrium” exchange rate which brings a country’s current
account into balance- neither deficit nor surplus. Third, historical
exchange rate data can be regressed against various economic indicators
(productivity, employment, etc.) in order to distill the select few that
had the most direct effect on the currency in the past. The most
current economic data can then be plugged into the resulting equation
and tested against actual exchange rates. However, while economists
agree that these techniques are the most theoretically sound, they
ignore the fact that currencies today seem less tied to the laws of
plain economics than they do to financial economics- capital flows.
Read More: Misleading misalignments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment