The Pound is holding its own against the USD, even touching a four-month high
last week. But against other major currencies, the story is just the
opposite. While managing to avoid parity against the Euro, for example,
the Pound has nonetheless remained range-bound against the common
currency. The Australian Dollar, meanwhile, has risen to $2 against the
Pound for the first time in 13 years.
How to explain the stagnation of the Pound? It depends on which currency
pair you look at. Against the Dollar, the narrative remains one of risk
aversion; when stocks rise, so usually does the Pound. “The U.K. pound
is joining other currencies in beating up on the dollar,”
announced one analyst on a day that stocks and commodities rallied
broadly. The Pound has also been able to hold its own against the Dollar
because both currencies’ Central banks have embarked on similar
quantitative easing plans, which could prove equally inflationary in the
long run. [Chart courtesy of Economist].
In fact, the Bank of England just announced a huge expansion in its
program, increasing total debt buying (i.e. money printing) by $50
Billion. One analyst summarized the impact of this announcement on forex
markets as follows: “The Bank of England’s aggressive stance with
regard to quantitative easing is adding to concern about the economy and
that is negative for sterling.” Not much nuance there….
In fact, this is especially bad for the Pound against the Euro, where
a juxtaposition of the Central Banks’ respective approaches to the
credit crisis reveals stark differences: “The weakness in the pound
suggests the market is drawing a contrast between the ECB, which seems
to be dragging its legs on quantitative easing, and the BOE, which is
still ‘full-steam ahead.’
” Where the ECB is providing liquidity indirectly in the form of swaps
and guarantees, the BOE is printing money and injecting it right into
capital markets.
“Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, has said the exit strategy
will be dictated by the outlook for inflation and that central banks
should not support markets that cannot survive on their own,” but
investors remain skeptical and for good reason. “Britain will sell a
record 220 billion pounds of gilts
this fiscal year, 50 percent more than last year.” Based on the fact
that yields have risen for four straight weeks (against the backdrop of
the first “failed” auction ever for UK government bonds), there is doubt
that the government can finance its deficits.
The BOE continues to be roundly smacked with criticism, for its role
in fomenting the credit crisis and in not adequately responding to it:
“It happens that in the early years of inflation targeting,
it did produce a stable economy. But I think it’s now clear that it
can’t, by itself, produce a stable economy,” argued one commentator.
Unemployment rates in the UK remain at frighteningly high levels. The
government’s own economists (which are more optimistic than third-party forecasts)
forecast GDP at -3.5% for 2009, with a modest recovery in 2010. Of
course, these forecasts should be taken with a grain of salt, as they
hinge on the crucial assumption that the BOE’s interest rate cuts and
quantitative easing plan will soon trickle down through the economy,
proof of which has still not been observed.
As a result, I’m personally between neutral and bearish for the UK
Pound. For as long as stocks continue to rally, investors will remain
Adistracted. If and when the rally loses steam (I am skeptical that the
rally is sustainable), they will quickly turn their attention to
comparative economic and monetary conditions; suffice it to say that
Pound won’t stack up well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment